revsoli.blogg.se

Survey of quantum error correction codes
Survey of quantum error correction codes





survey of quantum error correction codes

Let us now write down a few properties of these operators. Similarly, to also detect a bit flip on the third qubit, we need a measurement for a second operator, namely Thus, a measurement of this operator will tell us whether a bit flip on the first or second qubit has occurred. The states that result out of a bit-flip error are also eigenstates of this operator, but with eigenvalue -1. The error-free logical states are both eigenstates of this operator with eigenvalue +1. Where the upper index on a Pauli matrix indicates the qubit on which the operator acts. This error will modify our logical states as follows (the first two lines represent a bit flip on the first qubit, the next two lines a bit flip on the second qubit Suppose, for instance, that a bit flip occurs on the first or second qubit. A single bit flip error will flip one of the three involved qubits.

survey of quantum error correction codes

SURVEY OF QUANTUM ERROR CORRECTION CODES CODE

These logical states span our two-dimensional code space and describe one logical qubit. To introduce and motivate the formalism, let us for a moment come back to the simple example studied before – the three-bit code. This post will be a bit more formal, but is a necessary preparation to be able to define and understand the surface code and other topological codes. The link between these geometric constraints and the theory of quantum error correction is the stabilizer formalism described first in. In reality, however, this is not true – only nearby qubits and interact, and our error correction needs to take the geometric arrangements of the qubits into account. In our previous discussion of quantum error correction, we have assumed that quantum gates can act on any two physical qubits.







Survey of quantum error correction codes